- 1 Why does Rachels say that the divine command theory provides an implausible account of ethics for those who are believers in God?
- 2 What is moral knowledge according to Rachel?
- 3 What is cultural relativism according to Rachels?
- 4 What is the fundamental claim of moral absolutism also called formalism )?
- 5 What is the cultural differences argument?
- 6 Does morality depend on religion Rachels?
- 7 What is spontaneous moral knowledge?
- 8 What is the difference between morals and knowledge?
- 9 What is the morality of knowledge?
- 10 Why is relativism wrong?
- 11 What can we learn from cultural relativism according to Rachels?
- 12 What are the dangers of relativism?
- 13 Is absolutism good or bad?
- 14 What Utilitarianism means?
- 15 What does absolutism mean in ethics?
Why does Rachels say that the divine command theory provides an implausible account of ethics for those who are believers in God?
Why does Rachels say that the divine command theory provides an implausible account of ethics, especially for believers? If believers accept the Divine Command Theory it would mean that God has qualities that are inconsistent with their own idea of God.
What is moral knowledge according to Rachel?
According to Rachels, if cultural relativism is true, moral knowledge is: a. an incoherent notion.
What is cultural relativism according to Rachels?
Cultural relativism, the theory that what is morally right and wrong depends only on one’s culture, attempts to address the variance in ethical standards across cultures. In “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism,” James Rachels examines the influential theory of cultural relativism and questions its validity.
What is the fundamental claim of moral absolutism also called formalism )?
An idea opposed to relativism is known as Moral Absolutism (also called Formalism). This position claims that there are at least some morals and values that are objectively real. science provides our paradigm of objectivity and ethics seems to fall far short of science.
What is the cultural differences argument?
The Cultural Differences Argument: P1 Different cultures have different moral codes C Therefore, there is no objective “truth” in morality. Right and wrong are only matters of opinion, and opinions vary from culture to culture. This argument is not sound, because it is not valid.
Does morality depend on religion Rachels?
Rachels, Ch 4: Does Morality Depend on Religion? In contrast to a purely scientific worldview that is silent on values and suggests that human life, all life, the earth and the universe will eventually doomed to end. Seems natural that values of right and wrong (moral values) also come from this worldview.
What is spontaneous moral knowledge?
spontaneous, immediate moral judgments are instances of moral knowledge. These judgments have some other source of warrant and are instances of knowledge in virtue of something else. (3) This sort of moral knowledge or this way of knowing moral truths is better than knowing moral truths on the basis of argument.
What is the difference between morals and knowledge?
In the context of the above question, moral knowledge is awareness of right and wrong, but moral reasoning involves the wisdom which comes with experience of living.
What is the morality of knowledge?
Moral epistemology is simply epistemology applied to substantive moral claims and beliefs. Epistemology is the study of knowledge and justification in general. It asks whether, when, and how claims or beliefs can be justified or known or shown to be true.
Why is relativism wrong?
The problem with individual moral relativism is that it lacks a concept of guiding principles of right or wrong. While thinkers of cultural relativism are clear that it is wrong to impose one’s own cultural values over another, some cultures hold a central value of intolerance.
What can we learn from cultural relativism according to Rachels?
From cultural relativism, Rachels argues, we can learn: According to Rachels, the fact that different cultures have different moral codes implies that moral values lack objective truth.
What are the dangers of relativism?
Moral relativism can be dangerous since it leads to moral paralysis and indifference. Pluralism should be an opportunity to learn and develop our moral theories rather than claiming that absolute knowledge is an illusion.
Is absolutism good or bad?
Absolutism can bring more stability to a country. monarchies are more efficient, because there are no opposing parties. In extreme times and extreme difficulties, you need a good monarch figure to straighten things out.
What Utilitarianism means?
Utilitarianism is a theory of morality that advocates actions that foster happiness or pleasure and oppose actions that cause unhappiness or harm. When directed toward making social, economic, or political decisions, a utilitarian philosophy would aim for the betterment of society as a whole.
What does absolutism mean in ethics?
Moral absolutism is the belief there are universal ethical standards that apply to every situation. According to moral relativism, two people from different situations could disagree on whether an action is right or wrong, and they would both be right.